Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Google Sky Map Free app

AWESOME! Find out what constellations are in the sky above you. Google Sky Map even works indoors and during the day.

Monday, February 20, 2012

I have fallen : CRADAR app FREE

Interesting free app.

CRADAR (CRAsh Detection And Response) application uses the accelerometer to detect a fall and sends a text message alert you can use the preset message "My phone detected a fall. I might be injured" or create your own. You choose specified emergency contact from your contacts list, you can also use the GPS to include a map with your location.

Not certain how useful it is fortunately since there wasnt a real fall...but it was good for a few laughs during our testing.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Bruno Zamborlin and Norbert Schnell have created a device which allows the user to create sounds by tapping on any hard surface.


Monday, January 2, 2012

British teenage designer of Summly app hits jackpot



Nick D'Aloisio talks to Jane Wakefield about the inspiration for his app

Related Stories

Most teenagers will find any reason under the sun not to do their homework.
But 16-year-old South Londoner Nick D'Aloisio's excuse is better than most - he has been busy developing an app which has made international headlines and attracted a big investment from a Hong Kong-based billionaire.
Summly is an iPhone app which summarises and simplifies the content of web pages and search results. Currently it can condense reference pages, news articles and reviews but has the potential to go a lot further.
Mr D'Aloisio - the son of a lawyer and an investment banker - had the brainwave for it while studying.
"I was revising for a history exam and using Google, clicking in and out of search results, and it seemed quite inefficient. If I found myself on a site that was interesting I was reading it and that was wasting time," he said.
"I thought that what I needed was a way of simplifying and summarising these web searches. Google has Instant Preview but that is just an image of the page. What I wanted was a content preview," he says.
App generation
The first iteration of the app, called TrimIt, clocked up 100,000 downloads and caught the eye of Horizons Ventures.
The private equity investment firm is controlled by Li Ka-Shing, the Chinese billionaire who ranks as the eleventh wealthiest person in the world according to the Forbes rich list. His previous investments include Skype, Facebook and Spotify.
His firm sank $250,000 (£159,000) into the project.
Nick D'Aloisio at homeNick D'Aloisio developed the app in his Wimbledon bedroom
Mr D'Aloisio's app subsequently evolved into Summly, and since launching in mid-December has been downloaded tens of thousands of times.
Mr D'Aloisio's achievements mark him out from other teenagers - he is also extremely polite, highly motivated and enthusiastic. But it would be misleading to pigeon-hole him as a geek.
He enjoys the humanities, cricket and rugby. He does not even study computing at school - you get the impression there would be little point anyway.
"I want to do philosophy at university and I'm studying Chinese and Russian at school. I find the product and the design of the product much more interesting than the programming," he says.
Mr D'Aloisio is part of a generation of programmers who struggle to remember a time before iTunes, YouTube and mobile internet.
He was nine years old when he was given his first Macintosh laptop - "one of the old ones," he says with a wry smile - and set about teaching himself animation software before progressing through iMovie, Final Cut Express and Final Cut Pro in his Wimbledon bedroom.
He was doing it for fun - "I hadn't pushed out anything commercially," he says - which is somewhat reassuring given his age.
But it was only a matter of time before he started experimenting with apps. He downloaded the iPhone development kit and designed his first piece of software when he was 12.
Information overload
Called SongStumblr, it was a geo-social music discovery tool which allowed people to share music both with those in the same room and globally.
Next came FingerMill, which was basically a treadmill for your finger. "It was awful but at the time there was only a few thousand apps on the App store and it did manage a couple of hundred downloads," remembers Mr D'Aloisio.
He followed it up with FaceMood - an app which analysed keywords in Facebook statuses and profiles to suggest what mood someone was in at any given time.
By this point Mr D'Aloisio's hobby had set him upon an important path.
"It introduced me to the world of algorithms," he says.
Summly screenshotMr D'Aloisio has plans to extend his app beyond standard webpages to tackle social networks
Algorithms are sets of step-by-step instructions that carry out procedures designed to achieve an end goal. They are increasingly used to filter the mass of information on the internet - and proved to be the inspiration for Summly.
The app uses an algorithm to recognise what category of information a webpage contains by using "ontological detection" to identify its nature which in turn determines which set of instructions should be used to provide a consolidated summary of its text.
Or to Summlyfy this in Mr D'Aloisio's own words: "It can detect different genres or topics of webpages and apply a specific set of metrics to them."
So, for example, an article categorised as business news would trigger a different set of summary guidelines than those applied to a lifestyle feature.
Boy genius?
Launched in mid-December it clocked up 30,000 downloads in its first week and has summarised many times that number of web pages.
It is currently available as an iPhone app, and there are plans to launch Android and web versions in the New Year. However, Mr D'Aloisio has further ambitions for his invention.
"There is an abundance of information, too many social networks creating too much content. You need tools like Summly and Siri to distil it," he says.
He believes that summaries could make it easier to share content on Facebook and Twitter, and also thinks there is potential to condense e-books and emails.
Mr D'Aloisio reveals that several companies - which he will not name - have been sniffing around with a view to licensing his technology but says for now he is happy to see where it goes.
Modest
Gigaom blogger Om Malik was one of the first journalists to interview the teenager. He described him as a "boy-genius" and compared him to Google's founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and Amazon's Jeff Bezos.
Mr D'Aloisio shrugs off the genius mantle - learning to program "wasn't that difficult" he says.
In fact he still managed to squeeze in all his holiday homework despite having what others might have leapt on as the perfect get-out clause.
When he handed in his summer assignments by their start-of-term deadline his teachers were amazed that he had been able to code the Summly app and still have time for his coursework.
He has since been granted time off to travel to San Francisco in January for a meeting with his backers at Horizons Ventures. He says he may defer his mock GCSEs - although he quickly adds that he has no intention of turning his back on school.
"I enjoy it, seeing my friends, the sport, the whole thing", he says.
One suspects that he does not find the work too taxing either.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Thursday, December 29, 2011

The Most Important Gadgets of 2012


posted 6 hours ago
shutterstock_45356410
Rather than looking back (which I’m sure we will), I thought it would be nice to look forward to 2012 and beyond and note some of the gadgets that will change the world in the next few years. I’ve included mobile, gaming, and computing gadgets but I think 2012 will also be the year of Windows Phone, 3D printing, and fitness technology that actually makes a difference.
I’m not expecting much in the way of massive change this next year, just more of the same, but better. Here are our picks for the best of 2012.
Autom and Fitbit – Fewer things sell more products than weight-loss claims. Luckily, thanks to some new devices designed to help us get fitter, those claims are no longer snake oil. Take a look atAutom and FitBit (and the other devices competing in the cyberhealth space). These devices promise what geeks crave – stats – and also promise better health and decreased body mass. It’s a desk-jockey trifecta.
While many fitness devices won’t make it past 2013, I think weight-loss systems like Autom and pedometers like FitBit are the future of fitness. You can’t change what you can’t measure, and these devices let you measure just about everything.
Nokia Lumia 710 – A year ago I would have written Nokia off as a dead company. They were rudderless, without product, and perceived, at best, a commodity feature-phone player in a very competitive smartphone world.
With the arrival of cheap Windows Phones, however, Nokia is looking to take back the low end and win the business of folks who are either too busy, too annoyed, or too cash-strapped to invest in iOS or, increasingly, the more powerful Android flagships. To the anti-Microsoft contingent, Windows Phone is too little too late. In reality, we’re talking about Microsoft: when have they ever been on time.
There are plenty of folks out there without smartphones and no one ever got fired for picking something from Redmond for their IT fleet. Sure, the $50 Lumia 710 requires a two year contract with rebat and all that rigamarole, but the key number isn’t “2-year contract:” it’s $50.
Makerbot – This small, Brooklyn-based company isn’t very big but it’s very powerful. The company just raised $10 million and is working on better ways to get 3D printing to the masses. While not many of us – myself included – can see the value in a 3D printer in the home, I see 3D printing as a technology that just hasn’t caught up with our imagination. A decade ago a laser printer was a distant dream machine that cost thousands of dollars and seemed out of reach for many consumers. Now you can get a color model for a few hundred and every tech-savvy household has at least one color inkjet that can produce better photos than almost any photo lab.
3D printing is in the same boat: the machines are prohibitively expensive and complex, but with a few UI and marketing twists, I foresee a day when the kids print out model car parts the way they print out book reports.
Ultrabooks – Thinking back on the great netbook debacle of a few years ago: the rise in popularity, the fall in pricing, and their eventual death, it’s not difficult to imagine the ultrabook is phase two of the hardware-maker’s lemming rush. However, ultrabooks are a necessary addition to the laptop ecosystem and should be taken seriously. I could definitely see a large buyer picking up a few thousand ultrabooks for employees rather than a few thousand fat-and-heavies from Dell and Lenovo. It makes sense in terms of power, price, and portability.

Kindle Fire – Love it or hate it, the Kindle Fire is Amazon’s first salvo against the iTunes juggernaut. Amazon wants to sell you stuff. They don’t want to impress you with a tablet that runs Ice Cream Sandwich and can compute SETI@Home strings. The device is Amazon incarnate, an all singing, all dancing tablet for readers that will become, for many, the primary way to consume streaming video.
I’m not suggesting the Kindle Fire is great, but future Fires will be on the 2012 Christmas lists for many casual tablet users.

PSP Vita – I put the Vita here not because it will be particularly successful (handheld gaming is a hard business and phone gaming is making it even harder), but because it is the first of the next gen consoles to roll, inexorably, towards our living room. The Vita will ship in 2012, followed by E3 announcements by all the majors about updated hardware (I’m betting on a new Xbox announcement this year, but I doubt it will be released until 2014). The Wii U is next on the upgrade list while Microsoft and Sony are still trying to figure out what a next gen console is supposed to do and what it’s supposed to look like.
Sponsored Ads

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Why Use Google+: It's What You Know, Not Who You Know

Why Use Google+: It's What You Know, Not Who You Know

Google Plus

First Posted: 12/ 7/11 07:04 PM ET Updated: 12/ 7/11 07:04 PM ET

Why use Google+?

The question has dogged Google's social networking site since its launch in June. The service, on the surface, seems exactly like Facebook: You can share photos and updates with friends, chat with people, follow your friends' activities, and sort individuals into different groups based on your relationships with them. Only the vocabulary seems to have changed, with Facebook trafficking in "friend requests" and "likes," and Google+ in "circles" and "+1s."

Given that millions of people already juggle several social media services, many are wondering why they should manage yet another online profile and start over the process of forming friendships online.

Google's answer to "why Google+" has focused on the service's privacy features. The web giant has tried to distinguish Google+ from Facebook by saying that the new service "[takes] a privacy centered approach" and gives people more control over what they share and with whom.

A more compelling answer comes from Google+ users themselves. When asked why they use the new service, they describe Google+ as a place to make new friends, not re-connect with old ones, and explore their interests in everything from music and photography to politics and cycling. For them, the service's primary purpose is to deliver information, spark discovery and foster conversation between users scattered all over the world.

"Google+ is more about sharing ideas and content," said Giles Pettipher, a sound engineer living in Trinidad, during a conversation held on the Google+ Hangout group video chat feature. "Facebook is where I see graduation pictures and wedding announcements."

Users' experiences on Google+ tell the story of a site that fills the gap between existing offerings, complementing rather than directly competing with other online social media services. Its architecture, which encourages people to speak with strangers, leave lengthy replies, and customize the information they see, allows Google+ to occupy its own niche, users say. Their descriptions suggest the potential for a social media trifecta: Facebook as social network, Twitter as information network and Google+ as interest network.

Many pundits, analysts and users assume Google+ is Google's answer to Facebook, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently dismissed the service as an effort to build "a little version of Facebook."

But to some Google+ users, Facebook isn't the ideal. They say Google+ doesn't replicate the Facebook experience, nor do they want it to. They lament that Zuckerberg's social network has become a mind-numbing mess of personal updates posted by people from past lives. Google+, they say, offers an environment that promotes a dialogue about issues, rather than life events, between people who share similar interests, rather than the same middle school.

"Facebook and Google are two completely different things for me," Pettipher said. "Facebook is a way to interact with friends and family. Google+ is a way of finding fascinating content I'm interested in very, very, easily, that I wouldn't even have thought to go looking for."

While Facebook supports personal connections, Google+ fosters intellectual matches, say users, many of whom add that they've never met most of the people they interact with on Google+.

"It's a place to learn and grow the interests you have," said Richard Marsh, a technical support manager who lives in London. "I would say it's not really another place to connect with your friends, it's a place to cultivate new ones. Facebook is based on friendship barriers that are formed in normal social life. What I think Google+ does, is it breaks from the normal social boundaries into new areas."

"I don't see Google+ as a replacement for Facebook," added Ed Groshko, a Google+ user living in Taiwan. "I see it as a way to network with people I don't know."

Pettipher said he has used Hangouts to forge new relationships and has met, among other people, a coder who doubles as a hacker and firefighter, a model with expertise in gene therapy and stem cell research, someone claiming to be Eminem's cousin, and Susie, a genealogist. He noted there are DJ nights hosted on Hangouts and that he's spent six or seven hours at a stretch in Google+'s public video chats.

Asked to explain why people use Google's new social service, Google+ community manager Natalie Villalobos pointed to Google's willingness to tweak the site according to user feedback, as well as the ability of useres to connect with other like-minded individuals.

"People are utilizing the features of Google+ to discover and share meaningful content, while engaging with new and interesting people," Villalobos wrote in an email to The Huffington Post. "Google+ eliminates barriers to connecting."

People on Google+ say the service offers a space for thoughtful debate that can extend beyond 140 characters -- the limit for Twitter posts -- and a way of tracking news and hobbies. Users say that they use the Circles tool, intended as a way to sort people based on relationships, to set up what are essentially news feeds on interests, such as Formula One racing, Google's Android operating system, and photography. And unlike Twitter, where replies can get lost amid the busy stream of chronologically-sorted updates, Google+ also offers a static place for people to respond to each other's comments, essentially creating a conversation hub.

"Fb [Facebook] is like a gossip place," wrote Dervis Cakmakkaya in response to a question I posed on my Google+ account, "Why do you (or don't you) use Google+?" "But the content is the important thing here," he continued. "I can discuss many people even if I don't know them. Everybody shares what they have and we learn from each other. That's why I feel comfortable here."

Marsh added, "What I see with Google+ is that people are on there for a reason: they're looking for something, they're looking to share experiences, information or knowledge. If I want to have an intellectual conversation about whatever, say, the demise of WebOS the other day, I can. There are people on there that want to do the same."

Several users noted that Google+ offered higher quality discussions than on other social sites, something they credited both to the design of the site and its population of early adopters. When it debuted, Google+ was "invitation only" and quickly attracted people from the tech community who were eager to see Google's latest attempt at social networking in the wake of several high-profile flops.

On Google+, "I really do feel like the average IQ of my online experience has doubled," Pettipher said.

When I asked followers on Google+ and Facebook to explain why they did or didn't use Google+, I received over five times as many responses on Facebook than on Google+, yet the answers were half the length -- comments averaged around 47 words on Google+, compared to 21 on Facebook. The responses on Google+ were also spam free, while several Facebook posts included messages such as "very nise any time cell me [sic]" and "The story of Mohammed Bin Abdelkrim forgotten," which was posted with a string of lengthy URLs.

Existing Google+ users may be enthusiastic, but others still need convincing. Google+ hasn't escaped the critical mass conundrum, and many people say they aren't interested in a site that has only a handful of their friends, nor do they see what sets it apart from Facebook.

"I already have my connections here, on Facebook. I don't need another social network right now," wrote Facebook user Ignacio Trujillo.

"I tried Google+ for a month or so and couldn't find a compelling reason to start over," David Travis commented on Facebook. "None of my friends were there, hardly any of the people I follow were there. It seemed like a lot of work for little gain. I didn't want to start building a digital island that no one wanted to swim to."

Though Google+ says it has attracted more than 40 million users, the lack of activity some see on the service has invited comparisons to a "ghost town." Slate's Farhad Manjoo declared the social network dead less than five months after its debut, and traffic seems to have leveled out. Even some Google executives appear to have lost interest: Google co-founder Sergey Brin posted only one public entry in November, two in October.

Google won't give up without a fight, nor can it well afford to. The web giant has lusted after Facebook's treasure trove of data for years and needs Google+ to gain information about its users and better personalize its services and ads. The more Google learns about its users, the better it can target them with advertising, the more customized it can make its products, and the more money it can make.

"Today [users] come back to us in a largely unidentified state. We know very little about them and we remember very little about them," Google+'s vice president and product manager Bradley Horowitz said in an interview with Bloomberg. "The way we think about Google+ is changing this mode of interaction so we actually get to know our users deeply. We understand who they are, what they love, who they know and then reflect that back as value to them, so that all of our services get better when users use their own data in their own services."

If Google+ can evolve as an interest network, Google may be able to amass a different type of data than Facebook about its millions of users, information that's more focused on passions than personal relationships. But it remains to be seen whether Google+ can retain the quality content and conversation people find so appealing as the service grows.

"My experience on Google+ started out predominantly with complete strangers. Now, actual friends are coming online," Marsh said. "It'll be interesting to see what they put on here. When the people I'm friends with on Facebook and on Twitter come to Google+, I wonder if the content will change."

TOP LINKS ON THIS TOPIC